How to Count Lines of Code: A complete Overview

Counting lines of code can be used as one of the metrics to assess your developers' productivity and the efficiency of code bases. Therefore, in this blog, we dive into the different methods to count lines of code and what we think about this metric.Let’s dive in!

Methods to count lines of code

There are several ways to count LOC, some more efficient than others with different objectives. So we have a list for you to use the best method that suits your needs.

Manual Counting

Counting lines of code manually involves going through each line of code and tallying the lines while excluding comments, blank spaces, and non-executable lines.To do this, open the source code file and count the lines with a paper or text editor. Go through it line by line and check for executable code.Once you are done, note the total count.However this method might sound simple, yet it is tedious and prone to errors. Automated tools are more accurate and efficient, and we will discuss them in the following methods.

Count Lines of Code Command 

The Count Lines of Code (CLOC) command is a tool that automates counting lines of code.Here's how to use the CLOC command:

• Install the CLOC tool on your system.

• Open the terminal or command prompt and navigate to the code directory. You can use the command ‘cd’ followed by the path to reach it. 

• Run the CLOC command: cloc <directory> (replace <directory> with the path to the code).

• If you want to count the lines of the entire directory, simply replace the directory with a dot ‘.’ 

• Wait for the results, which will include the total lines, blank lines, comment lines, and lines of code for different programming languages.

Here is an example of the tool and its results.

‍

‍

The automated categorization of lines into different types and comprehensive statistics using CLOC makes it superior to manual counting. You can trust the reliability and efficiency of this tool to save you a lot of time and effort.

Here is an example of the tool and its results. CLOC offers outputs in various formats, ensuring you can extract data in nearly any text format you need. This flexibility makes it an excellent choice for teams needing detailed insights across diverse file types.

For those using integrated development environments, consider VS Code's extension that offers a user-friendly approach. The VS Code Counter extension can be installed directly into your IDE. It provides real-time tracking of lines of code in your current file and across entire workspaces. Moreover, it allows teams to customize how it interprets each tracked language using a file, without requiring complex terminal commands.

By leveraging these tools, teams can efficiently monitor their codebases, making these solutions invaluable for developers aiming to maintain clean and well-documented projects.

‍

Use statements to count lines of code 

While the above methods show the lines of code, if your code increases in more blanks, comments, and statements, then the number gets inflated without any value added to the functionality.Therefore, statements count is much more helpful in understanding the executability and functional efficiency of the code.In languages like C, C++, C#, or Java, a statement ends with a semicolon (;). And in languages like basic and VB, several statements can be added with a colon (:). Thus, the way it is done differs, but the logic remains the same.The executability (XQT) is calculated by dividing the number of executable statements (STMTX) by all the statements (SMT).Here are some specifics of this method:

• Counting statements provides insight into how the arrangement of statements affects the flow control within a program. Loops and conditional statements show you how many times a code section can be executed based on the scenario.

• You can identify the different code branches based on the multiple paths a code could take in each iteration. 

While this does provide code complexity information, it still needs to be a fool-proof method. Factors such as data dependency and error handling can hamper the executability of the code.

IL Instructions 

When measuring developer productivity, it's crucial to select the appropriate metrics. Simply counting lines of code may not be dependable. Instead, experts advise measuring the number of executable statements within the runtime environment, which is a more comprehensive and precise comprehension of progress.Here are the steps:

• Compile the code: Use a language-specific compiler to transform the high-level code (e.g., C#, Visual Basic) into an intermediate language (IL).

• Obtain the IL code: After compilation, you'll have an assembly or executable file containing IL instructions.

• Analyze the IL code: Open the IL code using a text editor or an IDE that supports IL syntax highlighting. You'll see a series of IL instructions representing lines of code.

• Count the lines: Simply count the number of lines in the IL code to determine the total lines of IL code.

Following these simplified steps, you can easily count the lines of IL code in your program.

Understanding Different Lines of Code Metrics

When evaluating your codebase, understanding the difference between various lines of code metrics is crucial. Let's explore the distinctions between raw lines of code, source lines of code (SLOC), and logical lines of code.

Raw Lines of Code

Raw lines of code are the simplest form of counting. This metric includes every single line in your code file—comments, empty lines, and all. While it may not offer the finest granularity, it serves as a quick snapshot showing the size or scale of a given code segment. For instance, if a branch in your repository suddenly swells to thousands of lines, it might be a signal to review and possibly refactor to maintain code quality.

Source Lines of Code (SLOC)

Source lines of code take a more refined approach by filtering out non-essential lines such as comments and blank spaces. This metric aims to capture the "active" lines in a codebase—those that are truly part of the executable logic. SLOC counts only the lines that contribute directly to the functionality, offering insights into the real complexity of a project. For example, consider a loop in JavaScript:

for(let i=0; i<10; i++) {
   console.log(i);
}


Here, the curly braces and other syntactic elements take up space but offer no added functionality, which SLOC doesn't account for, giving a clearer picture of functional length.

Logical Lines of Code

Logical lines of code delve even deeper by counting statements instead of relying on physical line breaks. This measure accounts for the number of logical endpoints in code, often identified by semicolons in languages like Java or C++. Logical lines adapt to languages that lack rigid syntax for line endings, like Python, where line breaks are not necessarily indicative of new logic. Thus, it's a more universal and accurate reflection of code complexity across different programming paradigms.

Balancing the Metrics

Each type of code line metric offers unique insights into a codebase's complexity and productivity. Depending on the programming languages in use and the team's goals, understanding and applying the right metric can improve code management and development efficiency.

In summary, knowing the distinctions between these metrics allows development teams to make informed decisions about code maintenance, refactoring, and optimizing code review processes.

‍

Do you need to count lines of code?

Counting lines of code has been a long-time metric; however, every tool and method gives different answers.Using it as a tool for productivity can be problematic because it is not comparable or fair unless you compare the same team’s code within the same team for the same code, language, and style. Here are some more points for you to consider:

• One developer may write concise code, and another might write more extended code to accomplish the same task. If LOC is a metric, then you might not be fairly judging the quality of their code.

• Lines of code are reused through existing libraries, and the rest is written to achieve the desired outcome. However, in such cases, you cannot ignore the reused code nor determine it as original. But that doesn’t negate the developer’s efforts.

• Productivity for developers is beyond writing code. Planning, testing, debugging, peer-to-peer reviews, and collaboration can take much time. Therefore reducing productivity to LOC will not be a fair assessment.

• LOC can give you glimpses into code complexity, code length, and executability, but that’s where its importance should stop.

• Measuring developer productivity solely by lines of code is like assessing a painting by its brushstrokes. It focuses on solution complexity rather than the complexity of the problem at hand. And like most metrics, it means very little without context.

• Therefore, we believe you can count the lines of code all you want, but don’t use it as a metric to determine which code is better or which developer is more productive. Use it as intended – as a metric to help you along the way.

Misconceptions and Real-World Impacts

While it's tempting to use LOC as a straightforward measure of productivity, this approach is riddled with misconceptions:

1. False Productivity Metrics:
   • A junior developer might write a function in ten lines, while a senior developer does it in three. This difference doesn't reflect productivity but rather experience and efficiency. LOC doesn't account for these nuances.
2. Code Bloat:
   • When developers focus on generating more lines, the quality of the code can suffer. This leads to bloated software that requires longer review processes and complicates the assessment of resources.
3. Team Dynamics:
   • Emphasizing LOC can create a competitive and hostile environment within teams. Developers might prioritize writing more code over writing better code, undermining collaboration and shared goals.
4. Stack-Ranking and Individual Performance:
   • Reliance on LOC can lead to stack-ranking, where developers are judged individually based on the volume of code they produce. This shifts focus away from team objectives and collaboration, fostering unhealthy competition.

In summary, while LOC can provide some insight into the coding process, it should not be the sole metric for evaluating developer performance. Emphasizing quality, collaboration, and the broader context of work is crucial to fostering a productive and positive development environment.

Balancing Lines of Code with Other Productivity and Quality Measures

Relying solely on lines of code as a productivity metric can be misleading. While it may offer some insight into a software development process, it fails to capture the full picture of what your organization is achieving. Here’s how you can balance this metric with other key measures to get an accurate view of your team’s performance.

Understand the Limitations

Counting lines of code offers a quantitative look at productivity, but it doesn't account for the quality of the output, problem-solving efficiency, or impact on the organization. Overemphasizing this metric could steer your focus away from meaningful achievements and place undue pressure on your team, possibly sinking the entire operation.

Implement a Holistic Metrics Program

For a more thorough assessment, integrate lines of code with other engineering metrics. Consider incorporating:

• Code Quality: Tools like Typo or SonarQube can analyze the quality of code and help teams maintain standards.
• Velocity: Examining the rate at which teams complete tasks within a sprint provides insight into workflow effectiveness. Jira can help track this progress.
• Cycle Time: Measure the duration from code commit to production to identify bottlenecks and streamline processes.
• Team Collaboration: GitHub’s pulse report offers another angle, showing how frequently teams commit changes and collaborate on projects.

Identify Bottlenecks and Set Goals

By assembling data from various metrics, you can pinpoint areas that need improvement and develop actionable goals. This approach encourages the team to focus on enhancing both the speed and quality of their deliverables. Tools like Trello or Asana can aid in visualizing task progress and identifying obstacles.

Encourage an Outcome-Oriented Culture

Shift the focus from sheer volume to strategic impact. Metrics like user engagement and customer satisfaction levels can better reflect the success of your product, aligning technical achievements with business objectives.

In summary, while lines of code can be a useful starting point, it's critical to balance it with a range of other productivity and quality measures. Doing so ensures that your organization remains agile, efficient, and focused on its broader goals.

‍

LOC can give you glimpses into code complexity, code length, and executability, but that’s where its importance should stop. Typo’s CEO and Founder, Kshitij Mohan, says, “Measuring developer productivity solely by lines of code is like assessing a painting by its brushstrokes. It focuses on solution complexity rather than the complexity of the problem at hand. And like most metrics, it means very little without context.” Therefore, we believe you can count the lines of code all you want, but don’t use it as a metric to determine which code is better or which developer is more productive. Use it as intended – as a metric to help you along the way.