What is a Pull Request, and Why is it Important?

Working collaboratively on a project means multiple people have different ideas and opinions. While working on an open source code with multiple people, imagine what happens if everyone starts updating the code haphazardly whenever they want to; that would be chaotic for the result.

This is where pull requests can help your team.

What is a Pull Request?

A pull request, also called a merge request, is a fundamental feature in version control systems like Git that enables developers to suggest changes to a codebase, repository, or software development project. The pull request button serves as a distinct platform for discussing and reviewing code changes and discussing the new feature. It enables keeping updates separate from the main project, promoting internal collaboration and potentially external involvement, and streamlining the debugging process.

‍

Why is a Pull Request Necessary?

Establishing a mature pull request process is crucial for any development team, particularly when managing a large or remote workforce. It serves as a backbone for enhancing productivity and efficiency within the team. Let's explore how a structured pull request approach offers significant benefits:

They Bring Efficiency into the Process

A mature pull request process allows developers to suggest changes and share them with the rest of the team. It not only helps streamline the workflow but also fosters an environment of continuous learning through feedback and suggestions. This process ensures efficient code reviews and controlled integration of changes into the codebase, boosting overall productivity.

Enables Collaboration

Pull requests encourage valuable communication and feedback between reviewers and contributors. Reviewers can leave comments directly on specific lines of code, addressing concerns, posing questions, and suggesting improvements. This collaborative approach fosters peer review, knowledge sharing, and a shared understanding among team members, leading to superior solutions and effective conflict resolution.

Tracks the Build Process

A robust pull request process is vital for the engineering manager to track the entire software build process. It acts as a central hub where developers propose changes, providing the manager with the ability to review, offer feedback, and monitor progress. This visibility into code modifications and team discussions enhances alignment with project objectives and quality control. Integration with project management and continuous integration systems offers a comprehensive view, ensuring streamlined coordination and oversight.

Code Quality Assurance

Acting as a gatekeeper, a mature pull request process ensures code quality through structured and collaborative code reviews, automated testing, and adherence to coding standards. This process guarantees that proposed changes meet project standards, maintain code quality, and comply with best practices.

Draft Pull Request

Draft pull requests allow for incremental development, enabling developers to work on code changes before final integration into the main codebase. This mechanism encourages continuous feedback and peer reviews, ensuring that the software development process remains flexible and aligned with project goals and standards.

In conclusion, establishing a mature pull request process is indispensable for enhancing a development team's productivity and efficiency. It provides a solid framework for collaboration, quality assurance, and process tracking, ultimately leading to successful project outcomes.

Challenges of Managing Pull Requests in Large-Scale Collaborative Projects

Managing pull requests is one of the most challenging and time-consuming parts of the software development process. A few of them include:

Communication and Oversight Issues

In large-scale projects, even when the team can communicate face-to-face or via email, there are always risks of something going wrong. Human errors, such as forgetting crucial details, are inevitable. Moreover, email threads can become an intricate web that complicates following discussions, leading to misunderstandings and missed information.

Solution

Implementing robust project management tools can help track all communication and changes effectively. Ensuring regular team check-ins and establishing clear communication protocols can mitigate these risks.

Branching Complexity

Managing branching for each pull request may become complicated when larger projects with multiple features or bug fixes are developed concurrently. It may also happen that change in one branch leads to change in another. Therefore, the interdependency can lead to a complex branching structure.

Solution

The engineering team must ensure that the branches are properly named, isolated, and updated with the latest changes from the main codebase.

A High Number of PR

Managing a large number of pull requests is time-consuming. Especially, when the pull requests are many and very few developers to review them. This further increases the frequency of merges into the main branch which can disrupt the development workflow.

Solution

The engineering team must set a daily limit on how many PRs they can open in a day. Besides this, automated testing, continuous integration, and code formatting tools can also help streamline the process and make it easier for developers.

Merge Conflicts

During peer review, merge conflicts are a common challenge among developers. It may happen that the two developers have made changes to the same line of code. This further results in conflict as the version controller isn't sure which one to keep and which one to discard.

Solution

One of the best ways to improve team communication and using project management tools to keep track of the changes. Define areas of the codebase clearly and assign code ownership to specific team members.

Simultaneous Code Modifications

Conflicts also arise when multiple developers make changes to different portions of the codebase at the same time. This can lead to integration issues that disrupt the overall development workflow.

Solution

Establishing clear code ownership and utilizing version control systems efficiently ensures smoother integration. Regularly updating branches with the latest changes can prevent many of these conflicts.

By addressing these challenges with strategic solutions, teams can manage collaborative development projects more effectively, ensuring smoother workflows and successful project outcomes.

How Can Teams Set and Track Improvement Goals in the Development Process?

Setting and tracking improvement goals is essential for development teams striving to enhance productivity and efficiency. Here's a comprehensive guide on how teams can achieve this:

1. Assess Current Standing Using Data:

• Begin by analyzing your pull request data. This data provides a benchmark against industry standards, helping you identify areas that may need attention.
• Leverage tools like GitHub or Bitbucket to generate comprehensive reports. These insights form the foundation of your improvement strategy.

2. Establish Clear Improvement Goals:

• Collaborate with your team to define specific, achievable improvement goals. These might include reducing the time to merge pull requests or increasing code review participation.
• Ensure goals are measurable and time-bound. For instance, aim to decrease the average pull request cycle time by 20% in the next quarter.

3. Implement Tracking Systems:

• Utilize platforms that offer real-time alerts and insights to keep your team aligned with the set goals. Tools like Jira or Asana can be instrumental in visualizing progress.
• Set up dashboards to monitor critical metrics continuously. This transparency ensures everyone is aware of the progression towards the goals.

4. Automate and Streamline Processes:

• Automate routine tasks where possible. This might include automatic code style checks or deploying build notifications.
• Use continuous integration platforms like Jenkins or Travis CI to reduce manual workload and keep the team on track.

5. Regularly Review and Adjust Goals:

• Conduct periodic reviews to assess the team's performance against the established goals.
• Be open to recalibrating objectives based on progress and new challenges that arise during the development process. Flexibility will enhance the team’s ability to adapt and improve.

By following these steps, development teams can effectively set and track improvement goals, leading to more efficient operation and faster delivery of features.

Components of a Pull Request

When making a pull request, ensure you make it as easy as possible for the reviewer to approve or provide feedback. To do this well, here are the components of a good pull request:

• Summary of changes made

• Description of why the changes were made

• List of files changed

• A list of changes that were made in the pull request 

• If applicable, include what kind of environments this should be tested on 

• Link the web pages where this issue could possibly be used to make a change 

• Test the proposed changes well in multiple scenarios and create test scripts for the reviewer 

• Any relevant screenshots or other media

• Reference to any related issues or pull requests

‍

‍

Process of Creating a Pull Request

Here are the steps to create a pull request:

Step 1: The developer creates a branch or a fork of the main project repository 

Step 2: The developer then makes the changes to this cloned code to create new features or fix an issue or make a codebase more efficient 

Step 3: This branch is pushed to the remote repository, and then a pull request is made 

Step 4: The reviewer is notified of the new changes and then provides feedback or approves the change 

Step 5: Once the change is approved, it is merged into the project repository

Process of Reviewing a Pull Request

Once a pull request is made, fellow developers can review the alterations and offer their thoughts. Their feedback can be given through comments on the pull request, proposing modifications, or giving the green light to the changes as they are. The purpose of the review stage is to guarantee that the changes are of top-notch quality, adhere to the project's criteria, and align with the project's objectives.

If there are any changes required to be made, the developer is alerted for updating process. If not, a merging process takes place where the changes are added to the codebase.

What Factors Contribute to Long Cycle Times in the Code Review Process?

Understanding the elements that prolong the cycle time during the code review stage is crucial for improving efficiency. Here are the primary factors:

1. Delay in Pull Request Pickup: When a pull request is created but not immediately addressed, it results in unnecessary delays. The longer it sits without being picked up by a reviewer, the more it extends the overall cycle time.
2. Time Taken for Review: Once a pull request is collected, the duration of the review itself can be a bottleneck. Factors such as availability of the reviewer, complexity of the code, and the necessity for multiple rounds of feedback contribute to this extended timeframe.
3. Size of Pull Requests: Larger pull requests often take significantly longer to review due to the volume of code requiring examination. Extensive changes not only demand more time but also increase the risk of introducing errors, further prolonging the process.

Addressing these areas effectively can lead to faster and more efficient code review cycles, ultimately enhancing the overall development workflow.

Best Practices for Using Pull Requests

Some best practices for using pull requests include:

• Creating small, focused pull requests that address one issue or feature at a time
• Providing clear explanations and context for the changes made
• Responding promptly to feedback and comments
• Ensuring that all automated tests pass before creating a pull request
• Using a code review checklist to ensure that changes meet project standards and guidelines

Why PR is Important for Code Reviews?

The code review process significantly contributes to extended cycle times, particularly in terms of pull request pickup time, pull request review time, and pull request size. Understanding the importance of measurement for improvement, we have developed a platform that aggregates your issues, Git, and release data into one centralized location. However, we firmly believe that metrics alone are not sufficient for enhancing development teams.

While it is valuable to know your cycle time and break it down into coding time, PR pickup time, PR review time, and deploy time, it is equally important to assess whether your average times are considered favorable or unfavorable.

At Typo, we strive to provide not only the data and metrics but also the context and insights needed to gauge the effectiveness of your team’s performance. By combining quantitative metrics with qualitative analysis, our platform empowers you to make informed decisions and drive meaningful improvements in your development processes.

Understanding Context and Metrics

We believe that context is just as crucial as raw data. Knowing your cycle time is a start, but breaking it down further helps you pinpoint specific stages of your workflow that may need attention. For example, if your pull request review time is longer than industry benchmarks, it might be an area to investigate for potential bottlenecks.

Industry Benchmarks for Improvement

To truly enhance your code review process, it's beneficial to compare your metrics against industry standards. We've compiled data into engineering benchmarks, allowing you to see where you stand and identify which aspects of your process need more focus to help your team ship features faster.

Actionable Insights

By using these insights, you can prioritize improvements in your development processes, focusing on areas that need optimization. With a clear view of how you measure against industry standards, your team can set realistic goals and continually refine your approach to deliver on promises efficiently.

We understand that achieving optimal performance requires a holistic approach, and we are committed to supporting your team’s success.

‍

‍